IDNT

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Irbesartan in Reduction of Microalbuminuria trial and the Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial found that irbesartan is renoprotective in patients having hypertension with type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess whether treatment with irbesartan is cost-effective in Canada relative to conventional care in this patient population and whether it is more cost-effective to treat patients early rather than later in the development of renal disease from the perspective of the Canadian health and social care system. METHODS: The analysis compared 3 alternative strategies for the management of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes and early renal disease: (1) conventional hypertensive treatment excluding the use of angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIRAs); (2) the early addition of irbesartan (an AIIRA) to conventional treatment; and (3) the late addition of irbesartan to conventional treatment. A Markov model was used to simulate the progression of renal disease (microalbuminuria to death) in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes over a 25-year time horizon. Transition probabilities were derived from the 2 randomized controlled trials. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted with outcome measured in life-years gained (LYGs). RESULTS: The early addition of irbesartan during microalbuminuria was cost-saving and more effective than both delaying irbesartan treatment until advanced overt nephropathy (AON) (0.45 LYG, Can $54,100 saved) and conventional antihypertensive use (0.62 LYG, $68,400 saved). This was due to the increased drug costs associated with the use of irbesartan being offset by savings arising from delays in the development of overt nephropathy and the subsequent delay to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the study results. CONCLUSIONS: The early use of irbesartan for patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes who have yet to develop overt nephropathy is both more effective and less costly than delaying irbesartan treatment until AON and conventional antihypertensive use. Analysis suggests that the earlier irbesartan is added to conventional antihypertensive treatment, the greater the delays in the onset of ESRD and the overall savings in health care resource utilization from the perspective of the Canadian health and social care system.

 prevention;  diabetes;  arb;  nephropathy;  MICROALBUMINURIA;  irbesartan;  economic evaluation;  IDNT;  IRMA;  

Checkout More Details | Available Online

Abstract: There is a rising incidence and prevalence of ESRD as a result of diabetes, with poor outcome and growing costs. Recently, two large trials, the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL), showed that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are more effective than traditional antihypertensive therapies at reducing progression toward ESRD in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy, regardless of changes in BP. The results of these two trials were used to compare the costs of ARB with those of renal replacement therapy (dialysis and renal transplantation) in an effort to establish whether ARB are cost-saving because they delay ESRD. Two different pharmacoeconomic approaches were used. With regard to the RENAAL trial, the number of ESRD days on losartan therapy as compared with the number of ESRD days on standard antihypertensive therapy was calculated, and the difference between the two was combined with the costs of ESRD. In the IDNT trial, Markov models were applied to assess the economic impact of irbesartan and to extrapolate future clinical and cost outcomes. Several economic analyses were performed in the United States and in European countries. Applying pharmacoeconomic models showed that treatment with ARB was associated with a greater improvement in life expectancy and lower total costs compared with amlodipine and standard antihypertensive therapy. Therefore, treating patients with type 2 diabetes, nephropathy, and hypertension with ARB is life- and cost-saving compared with traditional antihypertensive therapy.

 prevention;  diabetes;  arb;  nephropathy;  RENAAL;  losartan;  irbesartan;  IDNT;  economic review;  

Checkout More Details | Available Online

Abstract: AIM: Forty percent of hypertensive type 2 diabetes patients develop nephropathy (microalbuminuria/overt nephropathy), indicating end organ damage, increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and death. In France, screening rates and nephropathy treatment are suboptimal. We assessed the health economic impact of nephropathy screening in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes followed by optimal antihypertensive/nephroprotective therapy in those who have nephropathy in France. METHODS: A Markov/Monte Carlo model simulated lifetime impacts of screening for albuminuria (microalbuminuria/overt nephropathy) using semi-quantitative urine dipsticks in a primary care setting, and subsequent addition of irbesartan 300 mg to conventional therapy in hypertensive type 2 diabetes patients identified as having nephropathy. Progression from no renal disease to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was simulated. Probabilities, utilities and costs of CVD events, medications and ESRD treatment came from published sources. Cumulative incidence of ESRD, life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct costs were projected. Second-order Monte Carlo simulation accounted for uncertainty in multiple parameters. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually. RESULTS: Screening and optimized treatment led to a 42% reduction in the cumulative incidence of ESRD from 10.1 +/- 9.9% without screening to 5.8 +/- 5.7%, improvements in life expectancy of 0.38 +/- 0.59 years, improvements of 0.29 +/- 0.32 QALYs, and decreased costs of Euro 4,812 +/- 7,882/patient over 25 years. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust. Screening was most beneficial when performed in younger patients. CONCLUSION: In hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes, screening for albuminuria followed by optimal antihypertensive/nephroprotective treatment improves patient outcomes and leads to cost savings in France.

 prevention;  diabetes;  arb;  nephropathy;  screening;  MICROALBUMINURIA;  irbesartan;  economic evaluation;  IDNT;  IRMA;  BENEDICT;  

Checkout More Details | Available Online

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to project the long-term clinical and cost outcomes of irbesartan treatment, based on data from the irbesartan in Reduction of Microalbuminuria-2 (IRMA-2) study and the irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT), in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and renal disease in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Markov model adapted to the German setting simulated progression of renal disease and associated changes in mortality in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Early irbesartan 300 mg daily (initiated at microalbuminuria) and late irbesartan (initiated at overt nephropathy) were compared to a control scheme of antihypertensive standard medications with comparable blood pressure control, initiated at microalbuminuria. Cumulative incidence of ESRD, time to onset of ESRD, life expectancy (LE), quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and costs were projected over 25 years for 1,000 simulated patients, from a third party payer perspective. Clinical and cost outcomes were discounted at 5% per annum. RESULTS: When compared to standard blood pressure control, both early and late treatment with irbesartan were projected to reduce the cumulative incidence of ESRD fromm23.80.3% to 9.10.6% and 19.83%, increase discounted LE by 0.670.04 and 0.030.00 years, and improve QALY by 0.750.04 and 0.070.01 years per treated patient, respectively. Early irbesartan treatment was associated with a cost savings of i 12,658825 per patient while late irbesartan treatment was associated with a cost savings of i 4,116575 per patient compared to control over the 25-year time horizon. CONCLUSIONS: Early irbesartan treatment was projected to improve LE and QALY, and reduce the onset of ESRD, with cost savings, in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria in Germany. Later use of irbesartan in overt nephropathy is also superior to standard care. These findings suggest that irbesartan should be started earlier and continued long-term.

 diabetes;  nephropathy;  MICROALBUMINURIA;  irbesartan;  economic evaluation;  IDNT;  IRMA;   arb;  

Checkout More Details | Available Online

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT), treatment with irbesartan demonstrated 23% and 20% reductions in the combined endpoint of doubling of serum creatinine (DSC), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or death in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy compared to amlodipine and control respectively. A simulation model was developed to project long-term cost consequences of the IDNT in the Spanish setting. METHODS: A Markov model simulated progression from nephropathy to DSC, ESRD and death in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy. Treatment-specific probabilities were derived from IDNT. Country-specific ESRD-related data were retrieved from published sources. Delay in onset of ESRD, life expectancy and mean lifetime costs were calculated for patients with baseline age 59 years. Future costs were discounted at 6% per annum, and clinical benefits were discounted at 0% and 6% per annum. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Onset of ESRD was delayed with irbesartan by 1.41 and 1.35 years versus amlodipine and control respectively. When a 25-year (lifetime) horizon was considered, delay in ESRD onset led to anticipated improvements in life expectancy (discounted at 6% shown in brackets) of 0.46 (0.21) years versus amlodipine and 0.75 (0.37) years versus control. Irbesartan was associated with cost savings of 13,673 Euro and 7,632 Euro patient versus amlodipine and control respectively. The results were robust under a wide range of plausible assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Treating patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy using irbesartan was both cost- and life-saving compared to amlodipine and control in the Spanish setting.

 prevention;  diabetes;  arb;  nephropathy;  irbesartan;  economic evaluation;  IDNT;  temp;  

Checkout More Details | Available Online

Abstract: There are substantial healthcare costs associated with the provision of renal replacement therapy. Patients with diabetes mellitus are the largest and fastest growing group developing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United Kingdom (UK). Treatment leading to a slowing of progression to ESRD in diabetic patients could lead to considerable cost savings. Using treatment-specific probabilities derived from the Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT), the cost effectiveness of treating patients with hypertension, type II diabetes and nephropathy with irbesartan, amlodipine or control was calculated using a Markov model. UK-specific ESRD-related data were retrieved from published sources to reflect local management practices, ESRD outcomes and costs. Mean 10-year costs and changes in life expectancy due to ESRD delayed or avoided were calculated. Future costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 6.0 and 1.5% per annum and extensive sensitivity analyses were performed. Delay in the onset of ESRD with irbesartan led to cost savings of £5125 and £2919/patient and improvements in projected discounted life expectancy of 0.07 and 0.21 years over 10 years vs amlodipine and control, respectively. The costs of treatment of ESRD were the main contributor to the total costs. The cost of trial medications had only a minor impact. These results were robust in a wide range of plausible assumptions. Given that the IDNT efficacy results could be translated to a UK setting, treating patients with hypertension, type II diabetes and overt nephropathy with irbesartan was cost saving over a 10-year period compared to amlodipine and control.

 prevention;  diabetes;  arb;  nephropathy;  irbesartan;  economic evaluation;  IDNT;  

Checkout More Details | Available Online

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the most cost-effective time point for initiation of irbesartan treatment in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and renal disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was a Markov model-simulated progression from microalbuminuria to overt nephropathy, doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, and death in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Two irbesartan strategies were created: early irbesartan 300 mg daily (initiated with microalbuminuria) and late irbesartan (initiated with overt nephropathy). These strategies were compared with control, which consisted of antihypertensive therapy with standard medications (excluding ACE inhibitors, other angiotensin-2 receptor antagonists, and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) with comparable blood pressure control, initiated at microalbuminuria. Transition probabilities were taken from the Irbesartan in Reduction of Microalbuminuria-2 study, Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial, and other published sources. Costs and life expectancy, discounted at 3% yearly, were projected over 25 years for 1,000 simulated patients using a third-party payer perspective in a U.S. setting. RESULTS: Compared with control, early and late irbesartan treatment in 1,000 patients were projected to save (mean +/- SD) 11.9 +/- 3.3 million dollars and 3.3 +/- 2.7 million dollars, respectively. Early use of irbesartan added 1,550 +/- 270 undiscounted life-years (discounted 960 +/- 180), whereas late irbesartan added 71 +/- 40 life-years (discounted 48 +/- 27) in 1,000 patients. Early irbesartan treatment was superior under a wide-range of plausible assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Early irbesartan treatment was projected to improve life expectancy and reduce costs in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Later use of irbesartan in overt nephropathy is also superior to standard care, but irbesartan should be started earlier and continued long term.

 diabetes;  arb;  irbesartan;  economic evaluation;  IDNT;  IRMA;  

Checkout More Details | Available Online

Abstract: BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease (ESRD)-related health care costs are substantial. Improving clinical outcomes in patients at risk of progression to ESRD could lead to considerable health care savings. OBJECTIVE: We estimated the cost-effectiveness of irbesartan compared with placebo or amlodipine in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and overt nephropathy. METHODS: Three treatments for hypertension patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nephropathy were assessed: (1) irbesartan, (2) amlodipine, and (3) placebo. A Markov model was developed based on primary data from the Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial and the United States Renal Data System. Projected survival and costs were compared for each treatment at 3-, 10-, and 25-year time horizons. Different assumptions of treatment benefits and costs were tested with use of sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: At 10 and 25 years, the model projected irbesartan to be both the least costly and most effective (ie, demonstrating a survival advantage) strategy. At 25

 prevention;  diabetes;  arb;  nephropathy;  irbesartan;  economic evaluation;  IDNT;  

Checkout More Details | Available Online

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In the Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT), treatment with irbesartan demonstrated 23 and 20% reductions in the combined endpoint of doubling of serum creatinine (DSC), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or death in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy compared with amlodipine and control, respectively. A simulation model was developed to project long-term cost consequences of the IDNT in Belgium and France. METHODS: A Markov model simulated progression from nephropathy to DSC, ESRD and death in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy. Treatment-specific probabilities were derived from IDNT. Country-specific ESRD-related data were retrieved from published sources. Delay in onset of ESRD, life expectancy and mean lifetime costs were calculated for patients with a baseline age of 59 years. Future costs were discounted at 3% per annum (p.a.), and clinical benefits were discounted at 0 and 3% p.a. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Onset of ESRD was delayed with irbesartan by 1.41 and 1.35 years vs amlodipine and control, respectively. When a 10-year time horizon was considered, delay in ESRD onset led to anticipated improvements in life expectancy of 0.13 years vs amlodipine and 0.26 years vs control. Irbesartan was associated with cost savings of 14 949 and 9205/patient in Belgium, and 20 128 and 13 337 in France, vs amlodipine and control, respectively. The results were robust under a wide range of plausible assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Treating patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy using irbesartan was both cost- and life-saving compared with amlodipine and control.

 diabetes;  arb;  nephropathy;  irbesartan;  economic evaluation;  IDNT;  

Checkout More Details | Available Online

Abstract: BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether either the angiotensin-II-receptor blocker irbesartan or the calcium-channel blocker amlodipine slows the progression of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes independently of its capacity to lower the systemic blood pressure. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1715 hypertensive patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes to treatment with irbesartan (300 mg daily), amlodipine (10 mg daily), or placebo. The target blood pressure was 135/85 mm Hg or less in all groups. We compared the groups with regard to the time to the primary composite end point of a doubling of the base-line serum creatinine concentration, the development of end-stage renal disease, or death from any cause. We also compared them with regard to the time to a secondary, cardiovascular composite end point. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 2.6 years. Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a risk of the primary composite end point that was 20 percent lower than that in the placebo group (P=0.02) and 23 percent lower than that in the amlodipine group (P=0.006). The risk of a doubling of the serum creatinine concentration was 33 percent lower in the irbesartan group than in the placebo group (P=0.003) and 37 percent lower in the irbesartan group than in the amlodipine group (P<0.001). Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a relative risk of end-stage renal disease that was 23 percent lower than that in both other groups (P=0.07 for both comparisons). These differences were not explained by differences in the blood pressures that were achieved. The serum creatinine concentration increased 24 percent more slowly in the irbesartan group than in the placebo group (P=0.008) and 21 percent more slowly than in the amlodipine group (P=0.02). There were no significant differences in the rates of death from any cause or in the cardiovascular composite end point. CONCLUSIONS: The angiotensin-II-receptor blocker irbesartan is effective in protecting against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. This protection is independent of the reduction in blood pressure it causes.

 diabetes;  arb;  nephropathy;  irbesartan;  IDNT;  clinical trial;  

Checkout More Details | Available Online