| |  | Gangemi, Aldo | C-ODO: an OWL meta-model for collaborative ontology design read moreAbstract: Sorry no abstract available for this article  This article is not yet tagged | 2007 |
| |  | Catenacci, Carola | Design rationales for collaborative development of networked ontologies - State of the art and the Collaborative Ontology Design Ontology read moreAbstract: Sorry no abstract available for this article  This article is not yet tagged | 2006 |
| |  | Haase, Peter | D3.1.1 Context Languages - State of the Art read moreAbstract: Sorry no abstract available for this article  This article is not yet tagged | 2006 |
| |  | Masolo, Claudio | WonderWeb Deliverables D18 - Ontology Library (Final) read moreAbstract: Sorry no abstract available for this article  This article is not yet tagged | 2003 |
| |  | Gangemi, Aldo | Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE read moreAbstract: In this paper we introduce the DOLCE upper level ontology, the first module of a Foundational Ontologies Library being developed within the WonderWeb project. DOLCE is presented here in an intuitive way; the reader should refer to the project deliverable for a detailed axiomatization. A comparison with WordNet's top-level taxonomy of nouns is also provided, which shows how DOLCE, used in addition to the OntoClean methodology, helps isolating and understanding some major WordNet’s semantic limitations. We suggest that such analysis could hopefully lead to an “ontologically sweetened†WordNet, meant to be conceptually more rigorous, cognitively transparent, and efficiently exploitable in several applications  This article is not yet tagged | 2002 |
| |  | Gangemi, Aldo | An Overview of the ONIONS Project: Applying Ontologies to the Integration of Medical Terminologies read moreAbstract: Sorry no abstract available for this article  This article is not yet tagged | 1999 |
| |  | Masolo, Claudio | The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies Preliminary Report read moreAbstract: Ontologies are the basic infrastructure for the Semantic Web. Everybody agrees on this, as the very idea of the Semantic Web hinges on the possibility to use shared vocabularies for describing resource content and capabilities, whose semantics is described in a (reasonably) unambiguous and machine-processable form. Describing this semantics, i.e. what is sometimes called the intended meaning of vocabulary terms, is exactly the job ontologies do for the Semantic Web.  This article is not yet tagged | |